Article · 2017

Presidential Studies Quarterly

Attitudes toward Delegation to Presidential Commissions

Survey experiments show that delegating to presidential commissions does not increase public approval or perceived policy effectiveness compared to direct presidential action.

David R. Miller and Andrew Reeves

The publication begins with a motivating question: Do presidential commissions increase public approval or perceived effectiveness of policies compared to direct presidential action?

Its central contribution is to show that survey experiments show that delegating to presidential commissions does not increase public approval or perceived policy effectiveness compared to direct presidential action.

It matters because the findings connect institutional choices to the way authority, public responsibility, and political behavior are experienced in practice.

  • There is no significant difference in public approval between direct presidential action and delegation to a presidential commission.
  • Policies formed by commissions are not seen as more effective than those formed by the president alone.
  • Presidential commissions can satisfy public demand for action as effectively as direct action, but do not confer additional credibility or perceived efficacy.
Design
Article
Data
Survey experiments conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk)
Geography
United States
Time Period
2016–2017 (survey fielding period)
Unit of Analysis
individual survey respondent
Methods
Four survey experiments using vignettes based on real-world policy issues addressed by President Obama.; Random assignment of respondents to conditions describing direct presidential action, commission delegation, or control.; Measurement of approval and perceived policy effectiveness using Likert scales.
Featured visual from Attitudes toward Delegation to Presidential Commissions
Featured visual from the publication
Full Abstract

This article examines attitudes of the public toward delegation to presidential commissions. Using four survey experiments across a range of contexts, the authors compare public response to the creation of a commission versus direct presidential action. The findings indicate no significant difference in approval for taking action alone or delegating to a commission, at either the policy formulation or implementation stage. Additionally, policies formed by commissions are not seen as more effective than those formed by the president alone.

Presidential Studies Quarterly 47 (3): 495-516.

Venue
Presidential Studies Quarterly
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
495–516
DOI
10.1111/psq.12393