Article · Forthcoming

Political Research Quarterly

Elections and Representation in American Municipal Administration: Elite Survey Evidence from Five New England States

Elected municipal clerks in New England are more responsive to constituents than appointed clerks, but selection method has little effect on clerks’ ideological, partisan, or policy representation.

Wayde Z. C. Marsh, Michael P. Olson, Andrew Reeves, and Jordan Duffin Wong

The publication begins with a motivating question: Do selection methods for municipal clerks (election vs. appointment) affect how they represent their constituents in New England states?

Its central contribution is to show that elected municipal clerks in New England are more responsive to constituents than appointed clerks, but selection method has little effect on clerks’ ideological, partisan, or policy representation.

It matters because the findings connect institutional choices to the way authority, public responsibility, and political behavior are experienced in practice.

  • Elected clerks are more oriented toward public service and more responsive to constituent concerns than appointed clerks.
  • Selection method has little impact on clerks’ substantive ideological, partisan, or policy representation.
  • Elected clerks are generally less credentialed and work in lower-capacity offices but are more experienced and feel more self-directed than appointed clerks.
Design
Article
Data
Original survey data collected from municipal clerks in five New England states.
Geography
Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont (New England states)
Time Period
Spring 2023 (survey fielded)
Unit of Analysis
Municipal clerk (individual-level)
Methods
Original online and mail survey of municipal clerks in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.; Descriptive and regression analyses comparing elected and appointed clerks on responsiveness, attitudes, and background characteristics.
Six-panel chart comparing institutional capacity among appointed and elected municipal clerks
Featured visual from the publication
Full Abstract

Do selection methods for public officials impact how they represent their constituents? Municipal clerks in the New England states offer an ideal case to examine this question. As key government actors in full-service local governments with minimal overlapping jurisdictions, clerks in these states vary in how they are selected—either through election or appointment. Using an original online and mail survey of municipal clerks across five New England states, we find that elected clerks demonstrate a stronger orientation toward public service and are more responsive to constituent concerns. However, selection methods show little impact on substantive ideological, partisan, or policy representation. These findings highlight the relationship between the mode of selection and representation, offering a foundation for future research on other offices and dimensions of representation.

Forthcoming. Political Research Quarterly 79 (1): 323-339.

Venue
Political Research Quarterly
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
323-339
DOI
10.1177/10659129251389624